Skip to content
  • About us
  • Music
  • Celebrities
  • TV and Movies
  • Fashion
  • Entertaiment
  • Life Style
  • Travel and Health
Style Focus

Style Focus

  • About us
  • Music
  • Celebrities
  • TV and Movies
  • Fashion
  • Entertaiment
  • Life Style
  • Travel and Health
  • Toggle search form
  • Melfest queen Jacqline will make it “Effortless” at London Eurovision Party Uncategorised
  • Wallace & Gromit without Peter Sallis is ’emotional’ says Nick Park Uncategorised
  • Insects, horrible loos and no makeup – all in the hope of finding love Uncategorised
  • Lily Gladstone: The Native American actress who could make Oscars history Uncategorised
  • EXCLUSIVE: Katerine Duska shares “Sunshine” — her summery single about coming into a new light Uncategorised
  • Armenia confirms Eurovision 2025 return with Depi Evratesil as national selection Uncategorised
  • Poll: Who is your favourite Eurovision 2025 act so far? (17 February) Uncategorised
  • ‘We closed our eyes and we danced together’ – Madonna’s poignant goodbye to brother Uncategorised

No misconduct by Rooney lawyers, judge rules

Posted on 8 October 2024 By Admin No Comments on No misconduct by Rooney lawyers, judge rules

No misconduct by Rooney lawyers, judge rules

Coleen Rooney in a black dress looking serious
Coleen Rooney does not agree with Rebekah Vardy’s claims made about costs incurred during the 2022 libel trial

Coleen Rooney’s lawyers did not commit misconduct, a judge has ruled, after Rebekah Vardy accused her of “deliberately” understating her legal costs during the 2020 Wagatha libel trial.

Mrs Vardy lost that case after a judge ruled it was “substantially true” she had leaked Mrs Rooney’s private information to the press, and was ordered to pay 90% of Mrs Rooney’s costs.

The original cost estimate was £540k – it now stands at £1.8m.

Barristers for Mrs Rooney and Mrs Vardy have now returned to the High Court in a dispute over how much should be paid.

In a ruling on Tuesday, senior costs judge Andrew Gordon-Saker found “on balance and, I have to say, only just”, that Mrs Rooney’s legal team had not committed wrongdoing.

He said it was therefore “not an appropriate case” to reduce the amount of money that Mrs Vardy should pay.

He added that while there was a “failure to be transparent”, it was not “sufficiently unreasonable or improper” to constitute misconduct.

Mrs Vardy’s barrister, Jamie Carpenter KC, had claimed in written submissions that Mrs Rooney had “deliberately misled” Mrs Vardy and the court with previous estimates of how much money and time she had spent on the case, which he claimed was “serious misconduct”.

He told the court on Monday that she had previously “deliberately understated” some of her costs so she could “use the apparent difference in incurred costs thereby created, to attack the other party’s costs”.

He argued that this should lead to a reduction in the amount of money Mrs Vardy has to pay, but the judge disagreed.

Rebekah Vardy in a suit arriving for the 2022 case
Rebekah Vardy’s case in 2022 attracted huge media interest

Mrs Rooney’s legal bill was said in October 2022 to total £1,667,860, but has now risen to £1,833,907, the court was told on Monday

Mr Carpenter said that the figure was three times over Mrs Rooney’s agreed costs budget of £540,779, which he said was “a remarkable increase”.

But Robin Dunne, representing Mrs Rooney, said it was “misconceived” to claim the amount owed should be reduced, and that the budget was “not designed to be an accurate or binding representation” of her overall legal costs.

On Monday, he said: “Mrs Vardy’s argument appears to arise from her frustration that her deplorable conduct in this litigation has led to the budgets becoming irrelevant.

“Had Mrs Vardy conducted this matter in a reasonable fashion, Mrs Rooney would be confined to her budget and would have recovered no more absent good reason.”

This week’s hearing, which concludes on Wednesday, is dealing with points of principle, before a line-by-line assessment of costs. This will take place at a later date.

Neither Mrs Vardy nor Mrs Rooney attended court on Tuesday.

Coleen Rooney and her husband Wayne arriving in suits at the High Court, with lots of photographers taking pictures of them
Coleen Rooney attended the 2022 case with her husband Wayne

Nobu hotel costs

On Tuesday, Mr Dunne said that claims made in court on Monday about hotel costs incurred by a lawyer representing Mrs Rooney in 2022 were “factually incorrect”.

Mrs Vardy’s KC Jamie Carpenter had said Mrs Rooney’s total included costs for a lawyer staying “at the Nobu Hotel, incurring substantial dinner and drinks charges as well as mini bar charges”.

But Mr Dunne, noting the charges had been widely reported in the media as “evidence of the defendant wildly spending”, said they were “potentially defamatory” and steps would be taken.

He added that a “modest” hotel had been booked for the lawyer, but on the first night there had been no wi-fi or working shower, so he transferred to the Nobu after Mrs Rooney’s agent said she could get reduced rates.

A room at Nobu ordinarily costs £600 but was charged at £295, which he said was the same price as a room at a Premier Inn.

Addressing the claim that £225 had been spent on a food and minibar tab, Mr Dunne said the minibar bill had actually come to £7 for two bottles of water, and that the lawyer had not eaten at the Nobu restaurant during his stay.

Court drawing / sketch of Wayne Rooney and Coleen Rooney, and Rebekah Vardy and Jamie Vardy, listening to evidence at the High Court.
[L-R] Wayne and Coleen Rooney plus Rebekah and Jamie Vardy were depicted in a courtroom sketch during the 2020 case

Judge Gordon-Saker also rejected one of Mrs Vardy’s claims that it was “unreasonable” for Mrs Rooney to use Stewarts, a London-based law firm, and that she should have sought one near to where she lived in the north west of England.

Mr Gordon-Saker said: “This was always going to be a high-profile case and it attracted significant press coverage both here and elsewhere.

“Defamation is still a specialist area and most of the firms who specialise in defamation are based in central London.”

Regarding the size of the claim and the importance of the matter to the “reputations at stake”, he said “instructing a solicitor in central London was a reasonable choice”.

The judge also rejected Mrs Vardy’s claim that it had been unreasonable for Mrs Rooney to consult her barrister, David Sherborne, on 30 occasions, at a cost of nearly £500,000.

Mr Gordon-Saker added that the conduct of Mrs Vardy – in particular destroying evidence – “adds to the complexity” and “clearly justifies rates in excess of the guidelines” for the most experienced lawyers.

But he did say less experienced lawyers should have been charged at a lower hourly rate.

Adblock test (Why?)

Uncategorised

Post navigation

Previous Post: Pop star and international beauty queen Angela to represent Ukraine at Paris Fashion Week
Next Post: Saoirse Ronan says WW2 film is ‘incredibly relevant’

Related Posts

  • Crowds boo as sixth Banksy taken down just hours later Uncategorised
  • The Wiwi Jury reveals their favourites in Denmark’s Dansk Melodi Grand Prix 2025 Uncategorised
  • Melodifestivalen 2024: Sweden confirms full list of 30 acts for Eurovision selection Uncategorised
  • Zayn Malik postpones US tour after ‘heartbreaking’ loss of Liam Payne Uncategorised
  • BBC delayed Ozzy Osbourne film due to ‘family’s wishes’ Uncategorised
  • Angela - "Call Me Back": listen to the song that will reveal the secret of a long relationship
    Angela – “Call Me Back”: listen to the song that will reveal the secret of a long relationship Uncategorised

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Man guilty of stalking TV presenter Myleene Klass
  • Germany: Chancellor Friedrich Merz says he’d support Eurovision withdrawal if Israel is excluded
  • Queen leads tributes to ‘wonderfully witty friend’ Dame Jilly Cooper
  • First celebrity leaves Strictly after dance-off
  • New music this week: Songs from KEiiNO, Lord Of The Lost, The Black Mamba and more

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • March 2022
  • November 2008

Categories

  • announcements
  • Events
  • Fashion
  • music
  • Persons
  • Uncategorised
  • Vogue’s new editor says she has ‘big shoes to fill’ Uncategorised
  • Disney holds small-scale Snow White premiere amid controversy Uncategorised
  • A pioneering women’s World Cup erased from history Uncategorised
  • Taylor Swift Goes Green for 2024 Golden Globes as Travis Kelce Is Nearby for Kansas City Chiefs Game Uncategorised
  • Kristen Stewart Goes Pantless, Sports High-Cut Bodysuit and Tights to ‘Love Lies Bleeding’ Premiere Uncategorised
  • New music this week: Songs from Baby Lasagna, Aiko, Joost Klein and more Uncategorised
  • Interview: Valentyn Leshchynskyi says Ziferblat were almost crowned Vidbir 2024 winners after Diia app crash…while group works on new Eurovision bid for Ukraine Uncategorised
  • Ashanti Shows Off Purse Featuring Nelly After Rapper Confirmed Rekindled Romance Uncategorised

Copyright © Style Focus

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme